[grc] Some thoughts about the GRC Conference

[David Klann]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Ummmm.. Sorry for the lack of responses. I've been on the road for the
past week and a half....

So, how did you figure out the problem with posting to GRC?

  ~d


On 12/19/2015 03:41 PM, Ursula Ruedenberg wrote:
> I'd be interested in hearing from folks who would find it worthwhile to
> take a look at how to support the GRC conference process.  It is such a
> valuable thing - that conference. Conversation snippets of this have been
> occurring at recent conferences between various people. I see a number of
> things that warrant some thought:
>
>  - body of resources that can be gathered & passed on to the next host
> (such as boilerplate docs, sample budget, GRC fund, sponsor contacts, best
> practices & sample task lists, etc.)
>
> - check list of things to consider when stations thinking about hosting
>
> - some best practices for the decision-making process for where the
> conference goes next (such as communication, courtesy & inclusion shown
> towards new stations and minority groups, clear public articulation of the
> decision process, etc.)
>
> Maybe there are some considerations I haven't thought of; this is just
what
> I have noticed in my recent involvement.
>
> I  feel the value of us and the conference deeply -  means so much to me.
> So I am looking to stimulate this step towards supporting the conference.
> I have a conference call line and can offer this as a place to meet. I
> would ask you to post here if you can see your self contributing to such a
> building conversation or just if you think it is a good idea.
>
> Best wishes,
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlZ12zgACgkQZtxZ++32cNiZ5gEAzHL7MyQUVm8eZ2QQm1hvvFYL
s5NXnrx2g1ONchAAodcBANcNSr0SqlRhFCi+jxtjEkpZtL+752AImgb4wzoEqAq+
=jYLl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----