[grc] Media Alliance referenced

[riva enteen]

MA put out an email to this list supporting Silicon Valley censorship.  So
this is not a forum to respond to that?
Frankly, I find it shocking that GRC doesn't grapple with this new, very
controversial and potentially dangerous trend.  The debate was shut down.
I guess Adrienne agrees that we are not to talk about Silicon Valley
censorship.  No wonder the left is dead.

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 3:18 PM David Devereaux-Weber <president at wortfm.org>
wrote:

> Hi riva,
>
> The GRC is an email list created for the Grassroots Radio Conference. The
> purpose of the list is to discuss things about starting and operating
> community radio stations. We don't run Facebook. We don't determine
> policies for Facebook. Radio stations who subscribe to this list may wish
> to broadcast programs about this topic, but that is not the purpose of this
> list.
>
> You seem to be passionate about the topics of interest to you. That is
> great. But this is not the forum for that discussion.
>
> Dave
>
> David Devereaux-Weber
> President, WORT Board of Directors
> president at wortfm.org <President at wortfm.org>
> (608)576-2599
>
>
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 5:08 PM riva enteen via grc <grc at maillist.peak.org>
> wrote:
>
>> It was too much trouble for you to allow debate about your "circuit
>> breaker
>> technology."  So you think FB can censor Robert Kennedy, Jr. because he
>> violates their terms of service?
>>
>> I think pressure and judgement about remembering a person's pronouns
>> (plural yet) when a large group is introducing themselves is a distraction
>> from what we face, such as the real threat of nuclear war.  And yes, I
>> know
>> I will be called transphobic, but I am proud to use the word feminist,
>> although that apparently makes me a TERF.
>>
>> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 10:04 AM Tracy Rosenberg <tracy at media-alliance.org
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > You were not considerate, Riva. You said that it was too much trouble
>> for
>> > you to observe the gender identities that people wish to be recognized
>> by.
>> > By definition, that is rude and not considerate. You clearly need to
>> > rethink your position on not eradicating others.
>> >
>> > You also do not understand what circuit breaker technology is. Platforms
>> > do not determine truth, but they do define their terms of service, like
>> any
>> > other website, list serv, company, radio station or organization.
>> >
>> > -Tracy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 2, 2021, 09:55 riva enteen via grc <grc at maillist.peak.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I am glad to be considerate, butI think controversial issues must be
>> >> addressed in a principled manner.  MA seemed to shut down any debate
>> about
>> >> Silicon Valley determining truth and I think Tracy's response with
>> circuit
>> >> breaker begs the question.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 9:47 AM kenya lewis <kenyalewis at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Riva,
>> >> >
>> >> > What “stablished” this poorly edited set of personal observations and
>> >> > grudges is broadly relevant to this GRC list (or as part of a/the
>> black
>> >> > agenda)?
>> >> >
>> >> > Is it possible to be considerate of each other and use this listserv
>> to
>> >> > cooperate?
>> >> >
>> >> > Kenya
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> grc mailing list
>> >> grc at maillist.peak.org
>> >> http://maillist.peak.org/mailman/listinfo/grc
>> >>
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> grc mailing list
>> grc at maillist.peak.org
>> http://maillist.peak.org/mailman/listinfo/grc
>>
>