[grc] The return of VOA programming to shortwave radio?

[Michael D. Brown]

There were tests using 11 meters for DRM, including a demo station in Las 
Vegas during an NAB show.
The tentative conclusion I heard at the time was that the skywave interference 
was so variable at these frequencies, that creating an interference model was 
very difficult.  During some periods in the cycles, the skip could be severe. 
11 meters is a crappy band, in the transition area between SW and VHF, which 
is why they plopped CB radio there.




Michael D. Brown
Brown Broadcast Services, Inc.
3740 SW Comus St. ? Portland OR 97219-7418 USA
mike at brownbroadcast.com  ?  www.brownbroadcast.com
offc 503-245-6065 ? cell 503-703-3202


-----Original Message-----
From: grc <grc-bounces at maillist.peak.org> On Behalf Of Michelle Bradley via 
grc
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2022 6:21 PM
To: grc at maillist.peak.org
Subject: Re: [grc] The return of VOA programming to shortwave radio?

Yes.. definitely WBCQ, WTTW, WRMI, etc. will sell airtime.

While shortwave is in Part 73, it is actually administrated out of the 
International Bureau.

I am not aware of any restrictions on language.  But yes, the rules do state 
that the service is not intended for a domestic audience.  When stations 
request their frequency hours from the FCC, they have to state which ITU zones 
they are wanting to target and on which bands.  They must target zones outside 
of the USA (this even means that Canada and Mexico can be target zones).

Also, stations operating Digital Radio Mondiale (DRM) can operate at 10 kW. 
There are folks trying get SW stations licensed for the use of sending instant 
stock trading data via HF radio to Europe using the DRM datastream.

The programming rules are not enforced.. trust me, there's a lot of 
programming that does not promote international goodwill and the other things 
mentioned in those rules.  Preppers, militias, extremist evangelists, 
anti-semites and the like.  Of course, if the Commission goes after stations, 
this can raise a huge first amendment issue.. a rabbit hole I don't see a 
Commission of either party majority wanting to go down.

Also, because of the fact that shortwave stations can't target domestic 
listeners, a shortwave station is not considered an attributable broadcast 
interest.  Yes, that even means that a shortwave licensee can also own an LPFM 
(and one does).

When I was at the National Association of Shortwave Broadcasters convention in 
Elkhart, IN a few years ago, there was someone passing around the concept of 
allowing domestic shortwave service and with power levels of less than 50 kW. 
I am very on the fence about this.

One thing I have pushed in the past is the ability to use the 11 meter 
shortwave band (25.6~26.1 MHz) for local domestic broadcasting using Digital 
Radio Mondiale as an extension of the LPFM service with a primary goal of 
trying to reach minority expat communities.   I have already written draft 
service rules.  11m DRM local broadcasting has been tested in Germany, Mexico 
and Brazil and the ITU has specific directives that endorse the use of a 
portion of the 11m band for domestic local broadcasting.

If anyone has any shortwave questions, they can send them towards my shop. 
This is a subject we handle.


-- 
*Michelle Bradley, CBT, KU3N*
/Founder: REC Networks/
+1 202 621-2355
https://recnet.com
facebook.com/recnet - Twitter: @michichan



On 3/9/2022 8:40 PM, Bennett Z. Kobb via grc wrote:
> Anyone who wants to broadcast on shortwave will find plenty of airtime
> available on the commercial shortwave broadcast stations including
> WRMI, WINB, WBCQ, WTWW, WWRB to name a few. Most of their airtime is
> sold to evangelists, with a handful of alternative DJs.
>
> The FCC prohibits construction and operation of shortwave stations
> intended for a domestic US audience, and a minimum 50 kW power -- big
> an expensive, in other words -- is required if you are broadcasting in
> AM. There are also restrictions on languages.
>
> These are some of the WWII-era regulations which the FCC has never
> reviewed since they were established. The FCC thinks themselves are so
> innovative and deregulatory, but they have never re-examined these old
> restrictions which they still impose on stations.
>
> They make no sense now, and anyone who has followed my work on this
> subject knows my colleagues and I have been trying various openings
> within FCC to get these and other old rules changed or lifted.
>
> Not because we necessarily want to start shortwave stations -- though
> one of us does have a show on several SW stations. But we think anyone
> ought to be able to experiment and broadcast, much more cheaply, to
> Americans if they want to try.
>
> This scene may finally change, however, now that trading entrepreneurs
> want shortwave and have been spending big to get into it. This is
> forcing the FCC to think about things it has long ignored. That was
> the focus of the report I previously linked.
>
> Europe is way ahead of the US on this, as several countries have
> deregulated shortwave and allowed various private broadcast stations
> and a wide variety of programs.
>
> Benn Kobb
> _______________________________________________
> grc mailing list
> grc at maillist.peak.org
> http://maillist.peak.org/mailman/listinfo/grc
_______________________________________________
grc mailing list
grc at maillist.peak.org
http://maillist.peak.org/mailman/listinfo/grc